Ajuda para tarefas jurídicas

Programa de Complementação ao Atendimento Educacional Especializado as Pessoas Portadoras de Deficiência (PAED, 2004) foi instituldo pela Lei n^circ 10.845 de 5 de março de 2004. De acordo com os estudos deste programa, assinale V para verdadeiro e F para falso. ( ) Este programa passou subsidiar financeiramente instituçóes particulares, que não apresentavam fins lucrativos, para que oferecessem atendimento gratuito na modalidade de Educação Especial. ( ) Garantir a universalização do atendimento especializado de educandos portadores de deficiencia cuja situação não permita a integração em classes comuns de ensino regular. ( )Garantir, progressivamente,inserção dos educandos portadores de deficiência nas classes comuns de ensino regular. ( ) Formação especial, a implantação de salas de recursos multifuncionais, acessibilidade arquitetônica dos prédios escolares. ( ) Intuito de assegurar o atendimento especializado as pessoas portadoras de deficiência. A sequência correta para a resposta da questão 6: Alternativas V,V,V,V,v. V,F,V,F F.

Josefina submitted a complaint online that is non-serious in nature How will OSHA most likely respond? Select the best option. Conduct a worksite inspection Contact the employer by phone, fax, or email If you need to review this content, it can be found in the Reporting Hazards module of the Introduction to OSH;

An employer informs its employees that it will hold a substantial cash prize drawing for each work group at the end of each month in which no employee in the work group sustains a lost-time injury. Tyra reports an injury that she sustained while operating a mechanical power press. Tyra did not violate any employer safety rules when she sustained her injury. Tyra's injury requires her to miss work for two days. Her employer cancels the cash prize drawing for that month for Tyra's work group because of Tyra's lost-time injury. Did the employer misuse an incentive program to retaliate against Tyra? No Yes

Dana was required by her employer to take a drug test after Dana reported work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Her employer had no reasonable basis for suspecting that drug use could have contributed to her condition, and it had no other reasonable basis for requiring her to take a drug test. Rather, her employer routinely subjects all employees who report work-related injuries to a drug test regardless of the circumstances surrounding the injury. The state workers compensation program applicable to the employer did not address drug testing, and no other state or federal law requires the employer to drug test employees who sustain injuries at work. Did the employer subject Dana to a drug test to retaliate against her for reporting a workplace injury? Yes No

An employer informs its employees that it will hold a substantial cash prize drawing for each work group at the end of each month in which no employee in the work group sustains a lost-time injury. Tyra reports an injury that she sustained while operating a mechanical power press. Tyra did not violate any employer safety rules when she sustained her injury. Tyra's injury requires her to miss work for two days. Her employer cancels the cash prize drawing for that month for Tyra's work group because of Tyra's lost-time injury. Did the employer misuse an incentive program to retaliate against Tyra? Yes