Pergunta

Read Ahmad's argument in favor of changing the minimum driving age from 16 to 15 Every year, millions of teenagers look forward to the freedom of earning their driver's license. It has been proven over time that teenagers are fully responsible by the time they are 15, and making teens wait until they are 16 to obtain a driver's license is wrong. Many teenagers play sports, work jobs, and have an active social life when they are 15. It would be beneficial to the functioning of society if these people were able to independently drive themselves around. Parents agree, too. Most people believe that the streets would be safer if the minimum driving age were reduced to 15. What is the best evaluation of Ahmad's reasoning? It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning It is logical because it stays on topic. It is illogical because it shows no bias. It is logical because it gives true statistics.
Solução

4.7257 Voting

PauloEspecialista · Tutor por 3 anos
Responder
The best evaluation of Ahmad's reasoning is 'It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.'
Explicação
## Step 1<br />The problem presents an argument made by Ahmad in favor of changing the minimum driving age from 16 to 15. The argument is based on several assumptions and observations, such as teenagers being responsible by the age of 15, their active social life, and the potential benefits of reducing the driving age to 15.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The task is to evaluate the reasoning of Ahmad's argument. The options provided are:<br />- It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.<br />- It is logical because it stays on topic.<br />- It is illogical because it shows no bias.<br />- It is logical because it gives true statistics.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The first option suggests that Ahmad's argument is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning. This is a valid point because the argument is based on assumptions and observations that may not be universally true.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The second option suggests that the argument is logical because it stays on topic. This is not a strong evaluation because staying on topic does not necessarily mean the argument is logical.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The third option suggests that the argument is illogical because it shows no bias. This is not a strong evaluation because bias is not necessarily a factor in determining the logicality of an argument.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />The fourth option suggests that the argument is logical because it gives true statistics. This is not a strong evaluation because the argument does not provide any statistics.
Clique para avaliar: