The author cites the case District of Columbiav.Heller (2008) in order to A illustrate that the Supreme Court has incorrectly upheld restrictions on the right to bear arms B show that the author's perspective is supported by recent decisions made by the Supreme Court C illustrate that the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment has recently changed D ) make the case that the power of government needs to be expanded with regard to the right to bear arms

## Step 1<br />The problem is a comprehension question that requires understanding of the case District of Columbia Heller (2008). This case is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that interpreted the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court's interpretation in this case was that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms, unconnected with service in a militia, and to use them for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The author cites this case to show that the Supreme Court has recently made decisions that support the author's perspective. This is because the Supreme Court's interpretation in this case aligns with the author's viewpoint.